Why companies die but cities do not
Despite their apparent bumbling inefficiencies, cities are places of action and agents of change relative to companies, which by and large usually project an image of stasis unless they are young.
Companies typically operate as highly constrained top-down organizations that strive to increase efficiency of production and minimize operational costs so as to maximize profits. In contrast, cities embody the triumph of innovation over the hegemony of economies of scale. […]
Cities…operate in a much more distributed fashion, with power spread across multiple organizational structures from mayors and councils to businesses and citizen action groups. No single group has absolute control. As such, they exude an almost laissez-faire, freewheeling ambience relative to companies, taking advantage of the innovative benefits of social interactions whether good, bad, or ugly.
Slow to change, hard to kill
…Perhaps the most salient feature [of cities] is how relatively slowly fundamental change actually occurs.
Cities that were overperforming in the 1960s, such as Bridgeport and San Jose, tend to remain rich and innovative today, whereas cities that were underperforming in the 1960s, such as Brownsville, are still near the bottom of the rankings.
Roughly speaking, all cities rise and fall together, or to put it bluntly: if a city was doing well in 1960 it’s likely to be doing well now, and if it was crappy then, it's likely to be crappy still.
Once a city has gained an advantage, or disadvantage, relative to its scaling expectation, this tends to be preserved over decades. In this sense, either for good or for bad, cities are remarkably robust and resilient—they are hard to change and almost impossible to kill. Think of, Detroit and New Orleans, and more drastically of Dresden, Hiroshima, and Nagasaki, all of which have to varying degrees survived what were perceived as major threats to their very existence. All are actually doing fine and will be around for a very long time.
It takes decades for significant change to be realized. This has serious implications for urban policy and leadership because the timescale of political processes by which decisions about a city’s future are made is at best just a few years, and for most politicians two years is infinity. Nowadays, their success depends on rapid returns and instant gratification in order to conform to political pressures and the demands of the electoral process. Very few mayors can afford to think in a time frame of twenty to fifty years and put their major efforts toward promoting strategies that will leave a truly long-term legacy of significant achievement.
Cities are time accelerator machines
…So it's hardly news that the pace of life has been accelerating, but what is surprising is that it has a universal character that can be quantified and verified by analyzing data. Furthermore, it can be understood scientifically using the mathematics of social networks by relating it to the positive feedback mechanisms that enhance creativity and innovation, and which are the source of the many benefits and costs of social interaction and urbanization.
In this sense cities are time accelerator machines. The contraction of socioeconomic time is one of the most remarkable and far-reaching features of modern existence.
Lengths and areas are not always what they seem to be
…Even though your lungs are only about the size of a football with a volume of about 5 to 6 liters (about one and a half gallons), the total surface area of the alveoli, which are the terminal units of the respiratory system. where oxygen and carbon dioxide are exchanged with the blood, is almost the size of a tennis court and the total length of all the airways is about 2,500 kilometers, almost the distance from Los Angeles to Chicago, or London to Moscow. Even more striking is that if all the arteries, veins, and capillaries of your circulatory system were laid end to end, their total length would be about 100,000 kilometers, or nearly two and a half times around the Earth or over a third of the distance to the moon…and all of this neatly fits inside your five-to-six-foot-tall body. It’s quite fantastic and yet another amazing feature of your body where natural selection has exploited the wonders of physics, chemistry, and mathematics.
…Lengths and areas are not always what they seem to be.
The grungy reality of the physical world
Effectively forgotten
“We have proved the commercial profit of sun power. . . and have more particularly proved that after our stores of oil and coal are exhausted the human race can receive unlimited power from the rays of the sun.”
In 1897 Frank Schuman prototyped a solar energy generator, to great acclaim. But, as Benjamin West, in his book Scale, observes, “The discovery and development of cheap oil in the 1930s discouraged the advancement of solar energy, and Shuman’s vision and basic design were effectively forgotten until the first energy crises of the 1970s.”
Logarithmic scale
“Nothing draws a crowd quite like a crowd”
The Sony hack, 2014
What would it be like to see with your skin?
In the octopus's case there is a conductor, the central brain. But the players it conducts [the animal's limbs] are jazz players, inclined to improvisation, who will accept only so much direction. Or perhaps they are players who receive only rough, general instructions from the conductor, who trusts them to play something that works. [...]
Now we learn that an octopus can see with its skin. The skin is not only affected by light — something true of quite a few animals — but it responds by changing its own delicate, pixel-like color-controlling machinery.
What could it be like to see with your skin? There could be no focusing of an image. Only general changes and washes of light could be detected. We don't yet know whether the skin's sensing is communicated to the brain, or whether the information remains local. Both possibilities stretch the imagination. If the skin's sensing is carried to the brain, then the animal's visual sensitivity would extend in all directions, beyond where the eyes can reach. If the skin's sensing does not reach the brain, then each arm might see for itself, and keep what it sees to itself.
Blowing up in our faces
“It is not exactly that ‘nothing matters’…It is that nothing matters long enough to matter.”
Pantheon of reads from 2019
Looking through my notes and research on this last day of 20-frikkin-19. Of everything I read this year (written this year nor not), these articles, threads, and stories took me someplace new. My own personal pantheon.
The Spy who came home: Why an expert in counterterrorism became a beat cop
By @bentaub91, New Yorker, May 7, 2018 issue https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/05/07/the-spy-who-came-home(A visit with the remarkable @SkinnerPm)
Greta Thunberg's remarks at at Davos
The Guardian, 25 Jan 2019 https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2019/jan/25/our-house-is-on-fire-greta-thunberg16-urges-leaders-to-act-on-climate
"Adults keep saying: 'We owe it to the young people to give them hope.' But I don’t want your hope. I don’t want you to be hopeful. I want you to panic… And then I want you to act"
The Insect Apocalypse Is Here: What does it mean for the rest of life on Earth?
By @brookejarvis. NYT Magazine, Feature. 27 Nov 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/27/magazine/insect-apocalypse.html
"The most disquieting thing [was] the deeper worry…that a whole insect world might be quietly going missing"Losing Earth: The Decade We Almost Stopped Climate Change
By @NathanielRich, NY Times, 1 August 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/01/magazine/climate-change-losing-earth.html
"Their efforts were shrewd, passionate, robust. And they failed. What follows is their story, and ours."See No Evil
By @miriamkp, @logic_magazine, Issue #4, Scale, Spring 2018 https://logicmag.io/scale/see-no-evil/
[About the pernicious effects of supply chains]
”supply chains are murky—just in very specific ways. We’ve chosen scale, and the conceptual apparatus to manage it, at the expense of finer-grained knowledge that could make a more just and equitable arrangement possible.”Danna's Explainer On Why Pundit (Analyst) Panels Are Bad
By @dannagal, Dr. Danna Young, 26 November 2019 https://twitter.com/dannagal/status/1067070003986530304
"The game frame pits parties and groups against one another in an artificially constructed battle that fails to engage with the underlying issue."How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse
By Douglas Rushkoff, The Guardian, 24 July 2018 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/23/tech-industry-wealth-futurism-transhumanism-singularity
"The future became… a predestined scenario we bet on with our venture capital but arrive at passively."How Social Media Took us from Tahrir Square to Donald Trump
By @zeynep, Zeynep Tufekci, MIT Tech Review, 14 August 2018 https://www.technologyreview.com/s/611806/how-social-media-took-us-from-tahrir-square-to-donald-trump/
“How did digital technologies go from empowering citizens and toppling dictators to being used as tools of oppression & discord?”
Raúl Carrillo on the failure of The Big Names
@raulACarrillo, 5 March 2019 https://twitter.com/RaulACarrillo/status/1103020064494768128
"at Harvard, I had the privilege of learning economics from the Big Names…But the Big Names do not know -- or refuse to acknowledge -- what’s actually going down."“25 Years of Wired Predictions: Why the future never arrives”
By @davekarpf David Karpf, Wired, 18 Sept 2018 https://www.wired.com/story/wired25-david-karpf-issues-tech-predictions/
“The notion that the future of politics might, with the internet, become less rational and more dogmatic was scarcely explored.”
Looking back on it, it's a pretty dark list — but then again I think we're in a pretty dark place. (If you want some light, pay attention to people like @SkinnerPm, mentioned above, and follow their example.) I'm grateful to the many thinkers, writers, and doers who are helping all of us understand and think more clearly about the world we're living in — and who are giving us the courage to act.
Bonus Material
Book-length non-fiction
Other Minds: The Octopus and the evolution of intelligent life, by Peter Godfrey-Smith. Exquisite.
Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence, by Max Tegmark. Walking through the implications and significance of AI.
Fiction
Fall, by Neal Stephenson. Deep imagining of what it would be like for people to move into a virtual world, after death.
Fake News
“Breaking News.” Radiolab, 19 November 2019 https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/articles/breaking-news
“From Headline to Photograph, a Fake News Masterpiece”, about Cameron Harris, who created a fake story about an electrical worker who stumbled upon stacked boxes of ballots pre-marked for Hillary Clinton. By Scott Shane, NY Times, Jan. 18, 2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/18/us/fake-news-hillary-clinton-cameron-harris.html
“Why Facts Don’t Change Our Minds New discoveries about the human mind show the limitations of reason.” By Elizabeth Kolbert, New Yorker, February 27, 2017 Issue https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-our-minds
My education on what Facebook has become
“Is This Facebook’s Frankenstein Moment? A series of scandals have opened up the possibility that the company may have created something it can’t fully control.” By Kevin Roose, NY Times, Sept. 21, 2017 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/21/technology/facebook-frankenstein-sandberg-ads.html
“Delay, Deny and Deflect: How Facebook’s Leaders Fought Through Crisis.” By Sheera Frenkel, Nicholas Confessore, Cecilia Kang, Matthew Rosenberg and Jack Nicas, NY Times, Nov. 14, 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/14/technology/facebook-data-russia-election-racism.html
“The Impossible Job: Inside Facebook’s Struggle to Moderate Two Billion People.” By Jason Koebler and Joseph Cox, Vice/Motherboard, Aug 23 2018 https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xwk9zd/how-facebook-content-moderation-works
“Bolsonaro's win in Brazil tonight marks the end of the first Facebook elections: Here’s How A Handful Of American Tech Companies Radicalized The World.” by Ryan Broderick, Buzzfeed News, 28 Oct 2018 https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanhatesthis/brazil-jair-bolsonaro-facebook-elections
Climate
“Winning Slowly Is the Same as Losing: The technology exists to combat climate change – what will it take to get our leaders to act?” By Bill McKibben, Rolling Stone, 1 December 2017 https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/bill-mckibben-winning-slowly-is-the-same-as-losing-198205/
The Future
“Profiles, How William Gibson Keeps His Science Fiction Real. Midway through his career, the inventor of “cyberspace” turned his attention to a strange new world: the present.” By Josuha Rothman, New Yorker, December 16, 2019 Issue https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/12/16/how-william-gibson-keeps-his-science-fiction-real
“What 2018 Looked Like Fifty Years Ago.” By Jill Lapore, The New Yorker, 7 January 2018 https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/01/07/what-2018-looked-like-fifty-years-ago
Misc
“CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK, The Existential Void of the Pop-Up ‘… I went to as many Instagramable ‘museums,’ ‘factories’ and ‘mansions’ as I could. They nearly broke me.” By Amanda Hess Sept. 26, 2018 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/26/arts/color-factory-museum-of-ice-cream-rose-mansion-29rooms-candytopia.html
The extremely helpful and consistent work of @jayrosen_nyu, @ianDundt, @carolecadwalla, @zeynep, and more
Et tu, Instagram?
Kidfluencers
Samia is now 4 and has 143,000 followers on Instagram and 203,000 subscribers on YouTube. Her feeds are mostly populated with posts of her posing and playing, but they also feature paid promotions for brands like Crayola and HomeStyle Harvest chicken nuggets. […]
Another parent shared the prices commanded by the parent’s child on the condition of anonymity, citing concern that the disclosures could harm negotiations with brands. The parent said brands might pay $10,000 to $15,000 for a promotional Instagram post while a sponsored YouTube video might earn $45,000. A 30- to 90-second shout-out in a longer video can cost advertisers between $15,000 and $25,000.Assume they are fake
In the past, it often made sense to believe something until it was debunked; in the future, for certain information or claims, it will start making sense to assume they are fake. Unless they are verified.”
If this sounds like a suspicious and bureaucratic world—far from John Perry Barlow’s famous vision of a digital world in which ideas could travel without “privilege or prejudice” — it’s important to remember the alternative: a societal fracturing into a million epistemic communities, all at war with one another over the nature of truth.
“The location-tracking ‘MiSafe’ smartwatch may not be as safe as the name proclaims. According to security researchers from Pen Test Partners, the watches are easy to hack as they do not encrypt the data they use or secure each child’s account. The researchers found that they could track children’s movements, surreptitiously listen in to their activities and make spoof calls to the watches that appeared to be from parents.”